Unless training on the pelican increases all SVG ability, then good job.
Is it possible they use the same base pre-trained model and just fine-tuned and RL-ed it better (which, of course, is where all the secret sauce training magic is these days anyhow)? That would be odd, especially for a major version bump, but it's sort of what having the same training cutoff points to?
> This model is not a modification or a fine-tune of a prior model.
I'm curious why they decided not to update the training data cutoff date too.
https://gally.net/temp/20251107pelican-alternatives/index.ht...
There seem to be one or two parsing errors. I'll fix those later.
I tried the first one and 5 Pro gives this: https://imgur.com/a/EhYroCE
https://gally.net/temp/20251107pelican-alternatives/index.ht...
As your example shows, GPT-5 Pro would probably be better that GPT-5.1, but the tokens are over ten times more expensive and I didn’t feel like paying for them.
Extending beyond the pelican is very interesting, especially until your page gets enough recognition to be "optimized" by the AI companies.
It seems both Gemini 3 and latest ChatGPTs get a deep understanding of the representation of SVGs that seems a difficult task. I would be incapable of writing a SVG without visualizing the result and a graphical feedback loop.
PS: Would be fun to add "animated" in the short prompt since some models think of animation by themselves. Tried manually with 5 Pro (using the subscription), and in a sense it's worse than the static image. To start, there's a error: https://bafybeie7gazq46mbztab2etpln7sqe5is6et2ojheuorjpvrr2u...
