undefined | Better HN

0 pointszozbot2344mo ago0 comments

A postfix "*" would be completely redundant since you can just use p[0] . Instead of *p++ you'd have (p++)[0] - still quite workable.

0 comments

You're kidding, right? (p++)[0] returns the contents of (p) before the ++. Its hard to imagine a more confusing juxtaposition.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointszozbot2344mo ago0 comments

A postfix "*" would be completely redundant since you can just use p[0] . Instead of *p++ you'd have (p++)[0] - still quite workable.

You're kidding, right? (p++)[0] returns the contents of (p) before the ++. Its hard to imagine a more confusing juxtaposition.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse