undefined | Better HN

0 pointskrisoft3mo ago0 comments

> The purpose of zoomed out comparison is to show the quality reduction of applying this tool.

Reduction? Shouldn't the tool be improving the quality of the image? If it is reducing the quality then why do it?

> The purpose of zoomed in before picture is to show how a typical pixel misalignment.

Okay, but how does this supposed "misalignment" look on the picture? Would I even notice it? If not, does it matter? Did they just zoom in, and draw a misaligned grid over the zoomed in image? Or the grid fault lines are visible in the gestalt?

> Aligned pixels can be easily imagined.

Everything can be easily imagined. Misaligned pixels can be imagined. They could just write "our processed images look better" and let me imagine how much nicer they are. The purpose of a comparison is to prove that they are nicer/better/crisper whatever they want to claim.

0 comments

coldtea3mo ago

>Okay, but how does this supposed "misalignment" look on the picture?

People who are the target audience for this tool already know.

>Would I even notice it?

Yes.

>The purpose of a comparison is to prove that they are nicer/better/crisper whatever they want to claim.

They don't need to prove it to their target users. They already know the problem (for which several tools exist).

im3w1l3mo ago

The way I see it, converting something to pixel art is akin to lossy compression or quantization. The goal is to retain as much detail as possible given the constraints.

The exact way that pixels are misaligned is a feature of the specific AI models that generated the almost-pixel art.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse