undefined | Better HN

0 pointsn4r96mo ago0 comments

I searched for "CQRS" in both the HN thread that I linked and the article that that linked, and the only mention I could find was this:

> Companies burned hundreds of thousands of engineer-hours migrating from monoliths to microservices, or from HTTP service calls to event-sourced architecture, or from event-sourced architecture to full CQRS, and so on.

Is that what you're talking about? imo this hardly counts as an attack on CQRS itself. The issue is rather with enterprise companies forcing the migration of large codebases based mostly on hype.

0 comments

2 comments · 1 top-level

lloydatkinson6mo ago· 1 in thread

The reason you missed it is because it's a relentless attack on anything testing, anything DDD, anything CQRS, generally speaking across HN or Reddit or anywhere else. I didn't mean it was just this thread. The example I gave was just another one of them!

n4r9OP6mo ago

I'm struggling to make sense of what you're saying. Is there something concrete - some subtlety - that I missed?

I searched HN comments for mentions of "CQRS" over the past year. It's mentioned very infrequently outside of "who's hiring" posts, and mostly in a neutral manner. Very little of what I'd describe as a "drive-by attack".

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse