Incomplete Tasks Review Workflow - weekly review that analyzes your tasks, identifies gaps, detects duplicates, and generates a focused "plan of attack" with your highest-priority actions.
Both workflows combine classic productivity principles (GTD, weekly reviews) with AI assistance to reduce cognitive load and maintain system trust. They use command-line tools (find, ripgrep) to analyze your vault and generate processing recommendations in an easy-to-review card format.
Use at your own risk. Validate each command before executing it. It is strongly recommended to use a version control system (Git) in your Obsidian vault to visualize and revert changes made by the agent.
Any suggestions to improve these workflows are appreciated.
I can see the PARA structure and perhaps a bit of Zettelkasten in the peripheral (but that might be my own bias).
I'm using a similar system (here's a link) https://blog.hampusadamsson.com/blog/How%20I%20Manage%20Note...
And also a custom plugin to do parts of the LLM (here's another shameless link) lifting: https://github.com/hampusadamsson/modai
What I'm curious about and something I'm struggling with myself: are you feeling that the productive uplift of offloading work to an LLM limits the gain of managing a second brain like this?
Is it something like: if we delegate management, we could lose awareness of the knowledge contained in the notes?
I agree, the LLM support we lose some level of manual work, maybe that is useful to be more familiar with the information, although I am not sure if that is a critical step. The LLM gives us management support. We can use a command to collect incomplete tasks, the LLM is doing that with extra steps, and it shows us the collected information, but in the end, we decide which tasks to prioritize.
