After reading the article:
It appears the whistleblower complaint against DNI Tulsi Gabbard, filed in May 2025, has faced an eight-month delay in reaching Congress, far exceeding the typical weeks-long (two to three is the norm) window for such disclosures. One side allegedes 'stonewalling' while the agency maintains the delay is due to the document's extreme classification and complex legal hurdles.
Regarding the merits of the case: a representative for the Intelligence Community Inspector General stated that specific allegations against Gabbard were determined to be, "not credible." However, the whistleblower’s attorney disputes any official credibility determination was ever reached, leaving the status of the complaint in limbo. That said, there's absolutely no reason that this should not be shared w/Congress in compliance with the norms for this sort of whistleblower complaint.
e: typo of limb -> limbo
