undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbsder3mo ago0 comments

> Teacher-centered and direct approaches cope quite well with greater class sizes, but again they're unpopular among teachers.

Cite. All research I have seen completely contradicts this.

The limitation with larger class sizes is not "knowledge transfer"; it's "classroom management" aka dealing with a student causing an interruption for some reason (bathroom, injury, sickness, etc.).

I use the Gates Foundation as my primary citations because they are easily findable on the web and simply match all of the other findings. You max out at about 15 students per 2 teachers because one of the teachers can handle the inevitable disruption while the other teacher can continue teaching. The more students you add on top of the roughly 15, the more likely you wind up with 2 interruptions which stops the class cold irrespective of teaching technique.

And, as I have stated, most of the research focuses on elementary to middle levels. High school requires teacher specialization which confounds a lot of the data.

0 comments

zozbot2343mo ago

How Does Class Size Vary Around the World? (OECD, 2012) shows that there are countries such as Japan and South Korea with some of the largest average class sizes, and excellent educational achievement. Clearly it's far from the only or even the most important factor. The United Kingdom is one country that skews the other way, though there are countries like Estonia with similarly small classes that seem to do a lot better.

Nevermark3mo ago

I know nothing about those countries ratios.

But on the topic, I suspect the best time to have high teacher ratios is in the earliest years. Help children learn to manage themselves, focus, follow through, etc. Then work up to large class sizes in the upper years.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

zozbot2343mo ago

Nevermark3mo ago

I know nothing about those countries ratios.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse