Wow, you scooped us! we weren’t really expecting to launch here just yet, but happy to answer any questions y’all have :)
First, Pierre is building code storage for machines -- think GitHub’s infrastructure layer, but API-first and tuned for LLMs.
What does that actually mean? We’ve spent the last 18+ months speed running GitHubs infrastructure (with a lot of help from early GitHub folks)… this is Github’s spoke architecture with a few modern twists + object store for cold storage.
Up until this point, GitHub is the only team that’s built a truly scalable git cluster (gitlab, bitbucket, etc. are all enterprise plays, with different tradeoffs).
Code.Storage is meant to be massively scalable… and we’ll be doing a larger post on what that means, and the scale we’re already doing soon hopefully :)
On top of this, we’ve invested a TON of time into our API layer – we have all the things you’d expect, list files, create branch, commit, etc. – with some new api’s that agents have found helpful: grep, glob based archive, ephemeral branches (git namespaces), etc.
Right now we’re in private beta – but happy to do my best to answer any questions in the short term (and if you’re working on anything that might benefit from code storage or storing code like artifacts – please reach out to jacob@pierre.co
I've been look for a way to use Git for smaller, high volume document storage - think something like Google docs where every doc is a repo and every change is a commit - but also, where the vast majority of docs age out and are effectively archived and not used, but still need to be available.
This looks like it technically, I just wonder how well the pricing scales for that case of docs that might never be read again...
We have folks using us to back crms, design tools, and all kinds of "non-code" stuff.
Please reach out - would love to connect!
GitHub is a social consumer coding product first. There's user models, review and discussion primitives, ci, etc.
Code Storage is just a headless, api-first infra product. No users, no review primitives, no rate limits, etc.
Our company is obsessively focused on only 3 things:
1. reliability at scale 2. performance 3. code api surface
happy to dive into any of these in more detail if you want to shoot me over an email jacob@pierre.co
Took me a really long time to understand this. The blob thing is cool but otherwise it's a really confusing website. The audio playing without me wanting it was not cool though.
Sorry about the audio - will get that patched
Agents having no way to pay for their use is one thing; lack of deep integration within the business domain is another (e.g. if you're a Git provider, you'd probably want to offer CI/CD, PR workflows, release management, publicly discoverable repos etc., and boom - you just copied GitHub)
We're more targeting enterprise as storage infrastructure provider – selling directly to platforms who generate a bunch of code and need a place to put it.
end users wont really know we exist.
$1 GiB/month x 3 minimum replicas x 1024 GiB x 12 months
And according to the status page they only have CDNs in us-east and eu-central.
>Code Storage is designed for modern workloads: Vibe Coding platforms generating 1m+ new repos a day, AI copilots writing thousands of commits per session, teams branching and merging in real time, and apps syncing code across devices.
This is sort of a rant, skip if you must
Those 1m+ repos all have code no human has ever seen or will see. I'm afraid of being a luddite. But I can't believe we're taking vibe coding seriously, especially with these enterprise SaaS startups aimed at it. Abstractions have always come up but this is knowledge handover, this is knowledge reduction or destruction.
What happens to all of humanities greatest inventions when the current generation of developers die out? Who's going to maintain the basement? Where things haven't been abstracted? Who's learning at that level, who's keeping the knowledge alive when everyone's being told you just need to vibe instead of thinking logically?
I know why the push, people who never wanted to be developers, people who never wanted to code got into this for a paycheck or something else, they're welcoming this with both hands. I've seen people slowly lose their abilities they tried so hard to make.
I'm being fricking dramatic here all because of that blurb.
If not, then it seems like we’re managing the transition just fine, my man.
there are numerous inconsistencies and broken links
The link text that says they raised $23M but doesn't go anywhere is real sus
(can think of it kinda like what stripe does for payments… headless git infra, where you get an api key, and store / create as many repos as your customers need).
Here's the timeline if you're interested.
3 years ago we started building a direct competitor to GitHub with the theory that you need to build code storage, code review and CI to truly compete.
We spent about a year prototyping this all out, raised some money, and then started building this for real [tm].
Code storage felt like a HUGE moat for GitHub. Most of our competitors in the code review space:
- graphite - linear - (now cognition) - etc
All built directly on GitHub's apis – but we wanted to go down to the metal (something wrong with us).
A year and half into doing this, a few folks reached out and asked how we were scaling git… i waved my hands around a bunch and explained how hard of a distributed systems problem scaling git was… explained git three-phase commits, etc.
Fast forward a few more months, and we started standing up single tenant clusters of our infra for a few different codegen companies that also needed storage solutions.
And now here we are :)
And agreed with other commenters about better explaining what this is - some examples and use cases side by side with the alternatives would work.
