undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbrynet20d ago0 comments

AFAIK Loongson is dead and isn't made anymore, and unlike OpenBSD/sgi, Loongson was a little-endian arch. OpenBSD/octeon is a closer match, but also discontinued as Cavium switched to making ARM CPUs.

LoongArch is a new ISA and isn't MIPS compatible, and OpenBSD doesn't support it.

0 comments

lproven20d ago

> FAIK Loongson is dead and isn't made anymore,

Wrong. It is alive and well and in production from several vendors.

https://www.loongson.cn/EN

> Loongson was a little-endian arch

True.

https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch...

But... so?

> LoongArch is a new ISA

Partly. It is new but it's still close. A former colleague wrote about it:

https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/02/china_loongson_mips/

The article cites this post on the LKML:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87pmu1q5ms.wl-maz@kernel.org/

« You keep saying "not MIPS", and yet all I see is a blind copy of the MIPS code. »

Alpine supports it:

https://wiki.alpinelinux.org/wiki/Loongarch64

Debian is working on it:

https://wiki.debian.org/LoongArch

Gentoo is working on it:

https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:LoongArch

Doesn't sound dead to me. Sounds a lot more alive than multiple architectures that OpenBSD does support.

brynetOP19d ago

I didn't say Loogson the company was dead, or that LoongArch was either. I said the predecessor Loongson/Godson CPUs are, like the 2E and 2F, which were MIPS-compatible. They're not manufactured anymore, and were practically unobtainium when they were.

LoongArch is not MIPS, despite it having similarities. It's a new platform/ISA and requires a completely different toolchain and new OS port.

It is not at all "new MIPS-family hardware is being made today" like you originally wrote, and it has little to no relevance to SGI hardware.

lproven18d ago

> I didn't say Loogson the company was dead

Yeah you did.

« AFAIK Loongson is dead and isn't made anymore »

You are angrily arguing against things I didn't say and am not saying. I suspect you're downvoting me as well.

I never claimed it was entirely compatible, because it wasn't. Nobody ever said it was.

I'm saying that there are MIPS like architectures still being made today, and I stand by it. You seem to think they don't count. You have not coherently explained why. Maybe they are not close enough for you, maybe the endianness is not the one you want. I don't know and TBH I don't care.

It's close. It's related. There is new hardware in the greater MIPS-like family. If you or Theo de Raadt don't like it, that is not my problem.

You said, although now you're backtracking, that it's dead. That is not true.

I called you on saying things that are not true and ISTM that now you are trying to quibble.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse