undefined | Better HN

0 pointsNewsaHackO16d ago0 comments

It definitely does, which is why I put substantial amount of verbatim material. If someone can recite the first paragraph of Harry Potter and the sorcerers stone from memory, it surely doesn't mean they have memorized the entire book.

0 comments

gspr16d ago

Of course not. But if the passage they can recite is long enough that it is copyrightable, then surely distributing a thing that (contortedly or not) can do said recitation is a form of redistribution of the work itself?

NewsaHackOOP15d ago

No. It is against their TOS to attempt to jailbreak their models. While I don't agree that the models can recite longer periods of verbatim copyrighted material, even if it could, the person who is at fault is the person subverting the system, not the creator of the system. If I steal a library book and make copies of it to distribute illegally, it wouldn't make sense to hold the library at fault for infringing on the book publisher's copyright.

gspr15d ago

This is an interesting take that I hadn't considered. Your analogy with a library break-in is good. I'll need to digest this. Thanks.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsNewsaHackO16d ago0 comments

0 comments

gspr16d ago

NewsaHackOOP15d ago

gspr15d ago

This is an interesting take that I hadn't considered. Your analogy with a library break-in is good. I'll need to digest this. Thanks.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse