Is this not a backdoor way for YC to get signal on what people are building and find more startup ideas?
I've been working on agent workflow tooling and what keeps surprising me is how quickly authoring the skills becomes the trivial part compared to keeping them composable and in sync across projects.
gstack's git-clone-and-copy install model works great solo, but I'm curious how it holds up when different repos need divergent review gates or QA flows — that's where every "just copy the skills folder" approach I've seen starts to buckle.
You essentially get an agent in conductor.build who drafts multiple choice replies to your product and engineering questions from claude.
Dramatically improved code quality and speed of development for me.
https://registry.gitagent.sh/agent/shreyas-lyzr/gstack-agent
.
We recently had Case #001: a Claude Code agent got stuck in a 70-minute loop, repeatedly injecting a staging URL into a production config file. Raw logs showed "exit code 0" (all green).
To fix this, I built K9 Audit — a deterministic, non-LLM causal auditing layer. It drops directly into .claude/settings.json (zero code changes, perfectly compatible with GStack). It records a cryptographically hashed 5-tuple of what the agent did vs what it was supposed to do.
If you're using GStack to speed up, use K9 Audit as your seatbelt. Repo: https://github.com/liuhaotian2024-prog/K9Audit
and thank fuck for that
