undefined | Better HN

0 pointsloeg10d ago0 comments

> The think tank has nothing to do with Russia and official denounces the invasion and upholds Ukraine's territorial rights.

GP did not claim it was associated with Russia or that it had made specific claims about the invasion.

> They have simply written critically about the role NATO has played in making this conflict inevitable and the history of NATO sabotage of peace negotiations.

That seems aligned with the original claims.

0 comments

culi10d ago

In their own words

> We categorically condemn Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, and support U.S. assistance for Ukraine’s self-defense.

How is that possibly aligned with GP's blatant lies?

varjag10d ago

Literally in the same piece:

It has been suggested that QI’s approach is insufficiently critical of Russia. A cursory search of our writings and our website shows this to be false.

I wonder why would anyone suggest that, and frequently enough they have to get out of their way to write a disclaimer?

> How is that possibly aligned with GP's blatant lies?

Mate it's 2026, your gaslighting doesn't work for a few years now.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse