Yes. That's what I mean.
Constitution means nothing if it needs to be fixed retroactively. Specially if there is the possibility a strategy of acting faster than the law.
For example, some countries may open an impeachment process against the acting chair if they are found to not be respecting the constitution.
In some of those places. It is not a matter if it was done on purpose or not, it is a matter of not being planned to avoid the problem.
It worked much better 10/20 years ago than now, but technically, the system is there. It does not work well today because there is no real opposition to the government to trigger the mechanism, although eventually they flag it in order to keep some level power over the government.
Unfortunately, it has been practice of the current government to create and give away positions as ministers for the challenging parties to settle things down, and as expected, it became a exchange coin.
I don't want to dox myself, hence I am not naming the place.
