undefined | Better HN

0 pointsgaraetjjte5d ago0 comments

Well clearly there is use for these - how do you distinguish what you are accessing in smart-pointer-like types.

0 comments

You'd still use the "." operator. Value, reference, or smart pointer use the same syntax. This means you can refactor them easily.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsgaraetjjte5d ago0 comments

Well clearly there is use for these - how do you distinguish what you are accessing in smart-pointer-like types.

You'd still use the "." operator. Value, reference, or smart pointer use the same syntax. This means you can refactor them easily.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse