> P.S. everything in the response is wrong ... this person has no idea what it means to be Turing complete.

I know very well what it means to be Turing complete. All the evidence so far, on the other hand suggests you don't.

> An infinite tape. And to be Turing complete we must "simulate" that tape--the tape head is not Turing complete, the whole UTM is.

An IO port is logically equivalent to infinite tape.

> PDAs are not "extremely limited", and we are more limited than PDAs because of our very finite nature.

You can trivially execute every step in a Turing machine, hence you are Turing equivalent. It is clear you do not understand the subject at even a basic level.

> You can trivially execute every step in a Turing machine, hence you are Turing equivalent. It is clear you do not understand the subject at even a basic level.

LOL. Such projection. Humans are provably not Turing Complete because they are guaranteed to halt.