undefined | Better HN

0 pointsImustaskforhelp1d ago0 comments

9% ? /s (though To be honest I genuinely wouldn't be surprised if things go down so bad too at this point either)

0 comments

abound1d ago

Unironically, I think 9% uptime would be "one-tenth of a nine".

brookst1d ago

Are you saying 9.999% isn’t four nines?

munchler1d ago

Can’t tell if this is intended as humor, but I LOL’ed.

the_real_cher1d ago

It unarguably is.

mememememememo1d ago

Reliability where N is the number of nines:

1 - 10 ^ -N (multiply by 100 for percent)

So 9% is 0.09 for the calc

1 - 10 ^ -N = 0.09

10 ^ -N = 0.91

N = -log10 0.91

So 0.09 (9%) reliability is 0.0409586077 of a nine.

And running it thru... a tenth of a nine is 0.2056717653 or about 20.57% reliability

mememememememo1d ago

90% would be one 9 following the sequence back.

99.99

99.90

99.00

90.00

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

abound1d ago

Unironically, I think 9% uptime would be "one-tenth of a nine".

brookst1d ago

Are you saying 9.999% isn’t four nines?

munchler1d ago

Can’t tell if this is intended as humor, but I LOL’ed.

the_real_cher1d ago

It unarguably is.

mememememememo1d ago

Reliability where N is the number of nines:

1 - 10 ^ -N (multiply by 100 for percent)

So 9% is 0.09 for the calc

1 - 10 ^ -N = 0.09

10 ^ -N = 0.91

N = -log10 0.91

So 0.09 (9%) reliability is 0.0409586077 of a nine.

And running it thru... a tenth of a nine is 0.2056717653 or about 20.57% reliability

mememememememo1d ago

90% would be one 9 following the sequence back.

99.99

99.90

99.00

90.00

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse