undefined | Better HN

0 pointsdirk940181d ago0 comments

Fair point. The article doesn't mention LinuxToaster's products — the curiosity here is about the future of open source, not promotion. For what it's worth, toastd does what LiteLLM does in C with no Python supply chain, which is part of what got me thinking about this topic in the first place. But that's not in the post.

0 comments

gnabgib1d ago

Does this part -at the bottom of your article- not count?

> LinuxToaster is a set of Unix tools re-imagined for the AI era. From toast — sed with a brain — to ito, version control built for AI, to squawk, a messaging bus for AI and humans.

dirk94018OP1d ago

After reading the guidelines...

This IS the original source. I wrote it. The guidelines explicitly ask for this.

A post about supply chain attacks, the economics of open source, and the LiteLLM compromise that happened today is squarely on-topic for this audience.

Is "You're over-doing the self promotion" without engaging a single idea in the article a shallow dismissal?

ThrowawayR21d ago

We can see that your submission history is nothing but your own site (https://news.ycombinator.com/submitted?id=dirk94018) and various comments in your posting history history seem to be attempts to drive traffic to it so the other poster is correct in that you are are not adhering to the guidelines. If you have questions, you are welcome to email the site administrators using their email address on the contact page linked at the bottom of the page.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse