I agree. Not because I think that most AI content is worth reading, but because it can be criticized on more grounded merits. People wrote blogspam by hand for two decades before AI started generating it. It wasn’t high value when a human wrote it either.

On many (most?) posts, far more energy is spent arguing about whether a post is AI than discussing if there’s anything of value in the post.

I've stopped reading anything on blogs on the basis that it's now probably llm spew and life is too short for the signal to noise ratio that implies.

With the exception of things that places like HN seems to consider worth reading, which is why I'm looking through the comments to this and others to find recommendations.