undefined | Better HN

0 pointsnicoinstrument15d ago0 comments

I'm learning about inference by running vLLM on a k8s cluster (EKS), building a gateway to keep a <2s TTFT SLO.

Most recent ha-ha moment: I kept wondering if it was normal that my cluster was only able to process 4 requests per second per vLLM engine (just seemed really low to me).

I realized a better metric is in-flight requests... Each engine is processing 70 requests at any given time, streaming tokens for over 30s.

Code: https://github.com/Nicolas-Richard/vllm-on-eks

0 comments

iugtmkbdfil83415d ago

Deeper dives into those uncover interesting limitations that don't seem to be documented anywhere. On the other hand, it is through those reverse shibboleths that I am now able to tell that my boss's boss has no idea what he is talking about llm-wise.

korbonits14d ago

Have you considered using vLLM on top of Ray Serve (on EKS with KubeRay)? KubeRay makes Ray cluster-aware and there could be some optimizations you could make e.g. keeping that GPU fully utilized all the time :)

nicoinstrumentOP13d ago

Thanks for the suggestion! Have you found that Ray Serve’s built-in autoscaling plays nicely with custom SLO-based concurrency limits, or do you usually let Ray handle the load balancing entirely?"

korbonits13d ago

To be honest, I don't know because I have not hit many of those limits due to what I would call "moderate" scale. So far, I have just provisioned enough pods to handle the traffic as-is without using KubeRay. So k8s is handling the load balancing adequately at the moment, but Ray serve is not cluster-aware, only pod aware, for now.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse