Yes, I get that. I just don't think that interpretation is a good fit for the concept, since that was formulated from the POV of practical usability and cognitive load.
Though... now that I think about it, maybe it does fit - it's all about the question "practical usability for what?"
I suppose that if what you actually want to do is model and reason about theoretical computability, then most things that make languages convenient to implement things in actually are accidental complexity!