What a weird comment.

You think he cynically decided to boost his career by writing a detailed description of the exploits found in his own software.

Is there no room in your model of the world for someone to figure out something interesting using AI tools and then write about it just because they like sharing interesting information?

I can't speak to the larger trend of AI boosters, as I don't go out of my way to pay attention to them, but the practice of being vocally self-critical and openly discussing the flaws found in one's own software (whether from AI or human analysts) is a damn good idea for reasons that can best be understood by rehashing the vulnerability disclosure debate in one's own mind.

Seems to be working for a lot of people, and I won't really blame them that much. People want promotions, money and a job in general, and they will do stupid stuff to keep their jobs and increase their pay. Unfortunately, it's an incentives problem of our current mode of production.

Honestly your poor assessment is in all ways poorer than his poorly written creation.

Did you even have 2-3 minutes to click around his website and gave a read to his other article "Something that I used to love"?

Your type of disparaging comments give the impression of HN to others what HN totally isn't. I don't know if you wrote your comment esp. for engagement baiting.