https://github.com/blader/humanizer
You get a pass here because you're doing really cool stuff but it's kinda tough to read past the AI nonsense, and it's relatively easy to screen out "it's not x it's y" kind of things and the bolded bullet points.
Hiding these clues by another AI pass doesn't solve the core problem. Now you just end up with content that camouflaged better but is still equally low in nutritional value.
Vigorous writing is concise.
I was highly interested in reading this article from start to finish.
Ofc there are was a lot of slop moments, but author experience itself is great!
And i genuinely don’t care if he would share it through LLM article.
Just please remove slop markers :)
Tbh, I have a lot of thoughts and ideas and things to share and I do spend time and effort trying to de-AI-ing it but this should help a lot.
I'll try it out.
In fact, I was expecting getting shit on by HN readers for this but was pleasantly surprised that readers moved past it.
Your behaviour is not affecting the HN community in a positive way.
To be honest, my literal thought process initially when writing was: - I think this is cool, I should probably open source this - No wait, I'm again over planning, no one's gonna read this and the problem is probably too specific to me for anyone to care.
So I just mentioned "lets compare notes if anyone else trying".
Hence you can see from the comment above, I immediately realized I made a mistake when the parent asked for the Skill file. Should've had the link ready. Pleasant surprise.
