Ask HN: We need a standard way to say how much AI was used in a PR

1 pointsheeton3d ago1 comments

There's a big difference between these situations:

- a PR that is quickly drafted by LLM based on a prompt - a careful spec designed by humans, worked on by AI - a feature built with a dev and LLM closely working together, with code reviews - a feature with parts fixed up by AI, but 90% human written - human written, checked with AI

etc

Is anyone moving towards a standard way of describing this? I'd love something that can go at the bottom of an communication / PR / proposal.

1 comments

jjgreen3d ago

   [ ] Was AI used in this PR in any way at all?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

1 comments

jjgreen3d ago

   [ ] Was AI used in this PR in any way at all?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse