undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmystraline3d ago0 comments

If you cant ban or arrest or stop them, then you badmouth and create fake dissent and claim the 'documents are spyware and malware'.

And naturally, nanoclaw openclaw etm make it easy-peasy to make instant botfarms.

I must have triggered the botfarm, like how that "MK Rathbun clawbot" attacked Scott Shambaugh. Now at -3.

0 comments

tredre33d ago

You're not being downvoted by "sensitive bot owners."

You're being downvoted because you're lying.

There isn't a single comment claiming malware or spyware from anna's archive.

All the "negative" claims are either factual (the material was illegally obtained, that they take donations for faster access to said stolen material) or closer to neutral (nvidia paid a very small amount them for access).

The green accounts may very well be a coordinated attempt to badmouth anna's archive. But your attempt to protect AA is even more clumsy, somehow.

the_af3d ago

> There isn't a single comment claiming malware or spyware from anna's archive.

It's possibly flagged now, but at least one comment speculated whether AA had ties to the FSB and was selectively serving malware to specific individuals or orgs, while serving regular files to the rest.

Please be aware I am NOT making this argument, and you don't need to debate the technical feasibility with me (please don't, I'm not interested); I'm merely pointing out this is indeed something a minority are arguing here on HN, so "not a single comment" is an overstatement.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse