They do seem to be good at fooling people though.
Nevermind what they can do was pure science fiction just 3 years ago?
It doesn't change the fact that LLMs are not, and never will be, AGI.
The shape of the intelligence frontier has turned out to be much more jagged than anyone at the time expected, so I can imagine reasonable objections from someone who has a specific, concrete benchmark of AGI that wasn't invented 6 months ago and isn't yet met. If someone just has a subjective sense that they're not smart enough, I think they're wrong.