undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbogdanoff_22d ago0 comments

I'm starting to agree with you; I found the plan/develop/review workflow to work quite well, but I'm not at the point of not looking at the code at all yet.

I guess you actually review and actively participate in making the plan, you just don't review the code afterwards?

Could you share some more details on the specifics of your workflow? (What models/harnesses? do you use the same or different context windows? How exactly do you run the review, and how do you pass along and act upon the information from the review?) Also, how big are the changes you usually implement with one plan/develop/review cycle?

0 comments

stavros1d ago

Sure! Here: https://www.stavros.io/posts/how-i-write-software-with-llms/

The changes aren't usually very big, basically what you'd put in one ticket. If I need to make large changes, I do them in self-contained stages, if that's possible, otherwise I will tell the LLM to add specific tests in the plan, and I will test thoroughly after.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

stavros1d ago

Sure! Here: https://www.stavros.io/posts/how-i-write-software-with-llms/

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse