Skip to content
Better HN
Top
New
Best
Ask
Show
Jobs
Search
⌘K
undefined | Better HN
0 points
potatolicious
13y ago
0 comments
Share
Honest question: but isn't that just a broken implementation (and a very obvious brokenness at that)? It seems to me there's a big difference between someone not coding to the standard, and the standard making your taks impossible.
0 comments
default
newest
oldest
codeka
13y ago
The same could be said of UTF-16 implementations that don't support surrogate pairs.
tlrobinson
13y ago
But that's not true for UCS-2, which
can't
represent certain code points.
On the other hand, UTF-8 is ASCII compatible and more efficient for text that's primarily ASCII.
dsl
13y ago
If most implementations are broken, it becomes the standard.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse