undefined | Better HN

0 pointscodeka13y ago0 comments

You've moved the goalposts:

  u'\U00021613'

This is a UTF-32 code unit, not a UTF-16 code unit. Even UTF-32 doesn't help when you have combining characters. I suggest you read dietrichepp's post again, he's talking about Normalization Form D.

0 comments

est13y ago

Okay, if it's an explicit combining character what's wrong with explicit character part counting?

You know normalized form is the norm, right?

cmccabe13y ago

There are four different normalized forms in Unicode. Maybe you should enlighten us about which one you're talking about.

Or just stop embarrassing yourself.

est13y ago

Reading all of your comments, so you are suggesting a Unicode object should not have len() or substring() ?

A standard like that is totally not embarrassing.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointscodeka13y ago0 comments

You've moved the goalposts:

  u'\U00021613'

This is a UTF-32 code unit, not a UTF-16 code unit. Even UTF-32 doesn't help when you have combining characters. I suggest you read dietrichepp's post again, he's talking about Normalization Form D.

0 comments

est13y ago

Okay, if it's an explicit combining character what's wrong with explicit character part counting?

You know normalized form is the norm, right?

cmccabe13y ago

There are four different normalized forms in Unicode. Maybe you should enlighten us about which one you're talking about.

Or just stop embarrassing yourself.

est13y ago

Reading all of your comments, so you are suggesting a Unicode object should not have len() or substring() ?

A standard like that is totally not embarrassing.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse