Another one from the article: "A main factor in this machine's metrics is the fact that every Windows installation on it is clean. With PC manufacturers loading so much crapware on new laptops, this is a bit of an unfair competition. But, on the other hand, PC makers should look at this data and aspire to ship PCs that perform just as well as a cleanly installed MacBook Pro."
Does this result disprove that? Or does common knowledge show these results are based on inaccurate information? Or is it just that Thinkpad users are less likely to install Soluto?
A main factor in this machine's metrics is the fact that every Windows installation on it is clean. With PC manufacturers loading so much crapware on new laptops, this is a bit of an unfair competition. But, on the other hand, PC makers should look at this data and aspire to ship PCs that perform just as well as a cleanly installed MacBook Pro.
The Retina screens are probably going to get lower scores due to the way Windows handles them. It'd be nice if they give a more detailed breakdown of how those seemingly random numbers were calculated.
My personal Mac is better than any of these. I has 0 Windows errors per week because I don't run Windows on it.
Not exactly an objective measure.
I get so tired of these rankings that purport to be objective. The only opinion that matters when you are buying a computer for you to use is yours. Insert biggest "Duh." in history here.