My question: Twitter feels like totally the wrong platform for his thoughts. I know, I know, "it is what you make of it", but this feels a bit like a round peg into a square hole.
Why doesn't Marc just publish thoughts on Tumblr / Medium / Facebook / Wordpress / etc?
Just feels like this blog (and thread) is unnecessary....we're now at the point where someone compiles someone else's 140-character tidbits into a cohesive point, and we're all thankful for it. Kinda weird.
It all works out, ultimately. If it saves Marc a few minutes, it's probably worth it for him.
I've been meaning to do something similar for all of Elon Musk's interviews, but... I don't have the time, either. I have all the data sitting pretty in my Evernote but it needs some real brainwork-led-formatting.
Twitter lets you dash out thoughts and expand them as necessary though conversation. Much more lightweight.
It's an interesting experimental medium for drafting an essay though. I would love Marc to expand these into longer posts, but like nearly all successful people, I doubt he has the time.
I accept I'm probably wrong, but my feeling is that Twitter is on the wrong course. Not that they won't be successful in the direction that they're heading, just that they won't be nearly as successful as they could have been. It feels to me like they've lost track of their central appeal.
Yeah, I know that's vague and not much to hang onto. I should probably try to figure out what I really mean by it.
Remember when Google was run by Eric Schmidt? Different vibe, but the company needed it at that stage.
I don't think Twitter has necessarily closed any of the doors of earlier opportunities. If you think about them on the scale of IBM/HP/Apple, it's still early.
Thank you!
Let me know if you need help. I can pick a day of the week & help transcribe/collate that days tweets!
I don't understand this at all.
Like others have pointed out, blogging might have been better especially since tweeter is fleeting. When it is gone, it is gone (mostly). Storify's usecase is for putting different tweets from different timelines/times into a coherent flow.
I concede that twitter removes the friction of saying "Let me write a blogpost and think of a title". Maybe a new proper blog theme that makes title optional? I know Tumbr does something like this.
Another idea might be to modify the compose section of Twitter like buffer does http://imgur.com/PbpisGh. If you click the "longer than a tweet -LTAT " check box, You have more than 140 characters" say, 1000 characters?
When you click publish 3 things happen.
1. You automatically publish a Tweet with a link to the the post. ala longtweets
2. You have a post published on your normal blog. Maybe without a title
3. Your whole post can be read in within Twitter using Twitter card support.
PS: I wrote about Twitter spoiling coherent thought here http://oonwoye.com/2013/07/20/twitter-vs-blogging/
""" The problem with arbitrary metrics in complex situations — they tend to backfire. Give emergency services drivers rigid response time metrics, and they’ll tend to stay close in to urban centers. Surprise!
Andy Grove had the answer: For every metric, there should another “paired” metric that addresses adverse consequences of the first metric. Many companies and especially governments violate this principle continuously, and are startled by the result — every time. """
This last bit - Grove's paired metrics - does not seem nearly as widely known as it probably should be.
