undefined | Better HN

0 pointsleejoramo12y ago0 comments

I will ignore what I do for server backups, and I will focus on my MacBook. I run my web development business and my personal life off of this system.

The software I use: CrashPlan, Arq, DropBox, Carbon Copy Cloner.

CrashPlan: I have backing up my data, configuration /Users, /Library. I have a bunch of regex restrictions to not backup various files such as caches, VMWare images, etc. Crashplan backups up to their cloud servers every 15 minutes. When I am at home (where I work from) it also backups to a local copy of CrashPlan on a server.

Arq: I am doing daily backups to Arq. These are now being done to Glacier for long term / last resort backups. This only backups my /Users with heavy restrictions on which files.

DropBox: I have many of my documents stored in Dropbox with the PackRat feature to keep copies of every version and deletion. I don't consider DropBox to be backup by itself, but I often find it is much faster to find and restore something via Dropbox than other methods. I also take care about the types of data I put on Dropbox.

Carbon Copy Cloner: as I mentioned in another part of this thread, I think SuperDuper is better for most people. However, I do use CCC's ability to remotely do a boot able bare metal backup to my home office server. When I travel, I typically take an external backup drive with a current mirror of my system.

I don't use Apple's Time Machine. I think it is a good choice for most home users. As Apple has added more features to Time Machine, I do think about adding it to my mix.

That covers most things. I do have somethings under SVN or Git which could be considered another layer of backup.

Currently, the biggest pain point for me in backups is VMWare images. I currently have 4 Linux and 3 Windows images on this system, and they can cause a huge amount of data needing to be backed up every time they are used.

0 comments

Stratoscope12y ago

> Currently, the biggest pain point for me in backups is VMWare images. I currently have 4 Linux and 3 Windows images on this system, and they can cause a huge amount of data needing to be backed up every time they are used.

This is where a sector-by-sector backup program shines.

I don't know what to recommend on the Mac, but on Windows, ShadowProtect is pretty wonderful. It backs up only changed sectors - update 10MB in a 10GB file and it only copies that 10MB - and it's insanely fast.

Even with a file-by-file backup, one thing you can do for VMware images is to take a snapshot. After you take a snapshot, further changes to the VM don't go into the large .vmdk file you just snapshotted, they go into a new, potentially much smaller .vmdk file, so your next incremental backups may be much smaller.

ojilles12y ago

Why not just setup backups from inside the VM's, while having the base VM image backed up somewhere (once) as well?

leejoramoOP12y ago

I have sometimes done this with Linux VM's that I use for local development.

Usually, the VM disk images are some where between the need to backup Applications and configuration files, and not as important my work and data files.

The problem with VM's is not just the quantity of data that needs to be backed up, but the overall size of the data that needs to be evaluated. I think that CrashPlan does a pretty good job of just coping the changed data of the disk image, but it has to do a HUGE amount of processing with every backup. Therefore VM's are hard to fit in with the remote versioned backups of CrashPlan and Arq.

I do backup these up via Carbon Copy Clone when I mirror the entire drive.

Stratoscope12y ago

> Why not just setup backups from inside the VM's, while having the base VM image backed up somewhere (once) as well?

That would be quite a project, compared with backing up everything on the host system as I do now.

I have all sorts of VMs. Some of them are extremely minimal OSes (think router/firewall distros). I have no idea how I would be able to back these up from inside the VM. And even for the VMs where I could do that, why bother? It seems like a lot of work.

By having an extremely fast sector backup running on my host system, I can be sure that all of my VMs are backed up, with no extra effort when I install a new one. I don't have to worry about how I would do a "restore" in any of those specific VMs, I can just restore files on the host OS and know that it will work perfectly.

A much simpler and more convenient solution.

chmars12y ago

@leejoramo:

> DropBox: I have many of my documents stored in Dropbox with the PackRat feature to keep copies of every version and deletion.

Aren't you worried about the lack of encryption?

leejoramoOP12y ago

Due to privacy concerns, I don't put everything in Dropbox. But most of what I do doesn't need to be that protected. And I do keep somethings in Dropbox that have been gpg encrypted.

I live in a office and work environment with windows that people can look in. I don't much like people staring in, but I am also not about to keep the blackout curtains drawn at all times.

I do wish that there were other more secure options than Dropbox, but the combination of easy of use, price, third party support, and collaboration make Dropbox hard to beat.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsleejoramo12y ago0 comments

I will ignore what I do for server backups, and I will focus on my MacBook. I run my web development business and my personal life off of this system.

The software I use: CrashPlan, Arq, DropBox, Carbon Copy Cloner.

Arq: I am doing daily backups to Arq. These are now being done to Glacier for long term / last resort backups. This only backups my /Users with heavy restrictions on which files.

I don't use Apple's Time Machine. I think it is a good choice for most home users. As Apple has added more features to Time Machine, I do think about adding it to my mix.

That covers most things. I do have somethings under SVN or Git which could be considered another layer of backup.

0 comments

Stratoscope12y ago

This is where a sector-by-sector backup program shines.

ojilles12y ago

Why not just setup backups from inside the VM's, while having the base VM image backed up somewhere (once) as well?

leejoramoOP12y ago

I have sometimes done this with Linux VM's that I use for local development.

Usually, the VM disk images are some where between the need to backup Applications and configuration files, and not as important my work and data files.

I do backup these up via Carbon Copy Clone when I mirror the entire drive.

Stratoscope12y ago

> Why not just setup backups from inside the VM's, while having the base VM image backed up somewhere (once) as well?

That would be quite a project, compared with backing up everything on the host system as I do now.

A much simpler and more convenient solution.

chmars12y ago

@leejoramo:

> DropBox: I have many of my documents stored in Dropbox with the PackRat feature to keep copies of every version and deletion.

Aren't you worried about the lack of encryption?

leejoramoOP12y ago

Due to privacy concerns, I don't put everything in Dropbox. But most of what I do doesn't need to be that protected. And I do keep somethings in Dropbox that have been gpg encrypted.

I live in a office and work environment with windows that people can look in. I don't much like people staring in, but I am also not about to keep the blackout curtains drawn at all times.

I do wish that there were other more secure options than Dropbox, but the combination of easy of use, price, third party support, and collaboration make Dropbox hard to beat.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse