undefined | Better HN

0 pointssytelus12y ago0 comments

The trend toward subscription model is generally misguided. When you buy software, you are pre-paying the whole amount upfront. Plus your chance of defecting to competitor in near future (aka subscriptio "churn") is almost zero. Plus when you get new product with new features out, customer has a good justification to repeat the whole cycle again.

Subscriptions are good for utility type services which are stable, has continuous consumption, has very low margins of profit and has much less competition.

Adobe's subscription model is dumb. They are purely thriving on consumer mindshare but these prices are going to start hurting. Adobe's core business is ripe for breaking in.

0 comments

georgemcbay12y ago

I think you are vastly underestimating how much effort would be required to create software with similar feature sets to what Adobe's has.

I gladly pay them $10 a month for Photoshop and Lightroom and photography for me is just a hobby, not my job. There are free and paid but lower-cost sorta-work-alikes to both of those apps (and I even use them sometimes -- RawTherapee in particularly has some nice features), but nothing I've tried free or otherwise comes close to the overall feature set in those two packages.

bobbles12y ago

The current office 365 solution for me works out to be about $2 AUD a month per device.

Considering no 'upfront' cost that isn't really too bad for me, and I have no problems paying for tools I actually use to get work done.

If people want to edit Office documents using non-Office software there are plenty of free alternatives.

The fact that Microsoft is the only company able to do this without formatting errors is value that I think is worth the fee.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse