undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbyrneseyeview16y ago0 comments

You're saying that someone who talks about the percentage growth in their customers would be just as concerned about the percentage shrinkage of their non-customers? Unless you're Facebook or Coca-Cola, you probably don't assume that the majority of people in the world will at some point use your product. So it doesn't make sense to measure your shrinkage of non-marketshare.

The percentage change in users is the interesting number. If someone said "My conversions went up by 100 per week!" I would say "What percentage increase is that?" If someone said "My conversions went up five percentage points!" I would say "What percentage increase was that?" If they said "My conversions went up 20%," I would know what I wanted to know.

0 comments

videophile16y ago

Values reported as percentages should generally be values between 0 and 100. So when the real conversion rate goes from 0.002% to 10%, the reported number should not be 499900%.

I expect hackers to use metrics that are at least defined over the range they are supposed to be used. Imagine that the conversion rate goes from 0% to 1%. I report 1% improvement, the value I measured. You? (1-0)/0 = what percent?

fallentimes16y ago

It's _not_ a one percent improvement (1%). That is mathematically incorrect.

It's a one percentage point improvement. Wrong terminology is responsible for 95% of this thread.

byrneseyeviewOP16y ago

No, because that means you're using different metrics to compare the same changes, e.g. "Over the last five years, one of my stocks went up 75%. One went up 100%. One went up 125%." What purpose is served by making the last two numbers a different scale? (If you'd like to stick with the percentage terms, pretend I'm talking about dividend yield and not stock price)

videophile16y ago

Bad example. The whole discussion is about reporting percentages of percentages.

Look, it's pretty clear that hackers have left the building and let marketroids rush in. Feel free to use your ill-defined metric. If you have the least bit of intellectual curiosity, you'd let everyone know what you'd report when the value goes from 0 to a non-zero value. That is all.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsbyrneseyeview16y ago0 comments

0 comments

videophile16y ago

Values reported as percentages should generally be values between 0 and 100. So when the real conversion rate goes from 0.002% to 10%, the reported number should not be 499900%.

fallentimes16y ago

It's _not_ a one percent improvement (1%). That is mathematically incorrect.

It's a one percentage point improvement. Wrong terminology is responsible for 95% of this thread.

byrneseyeviewOP16y ago

videophile16y ago

Bad example. The whole discussion is about reporting percentages of percentages.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse