undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbcantrill11y ago0 comments

It's not a small chance at all -- and it only comes after a conversation where I have done basic vetting and where I have explained why the problems that we're solving are exciting to me. (That is, if you're not ginned up to do the homework, I haven't done my job -- or it's not a fit.)

And as an aside, your test for ethics is entirely asinine, as it renders anything of sub-infinite scale unethical. (Among its more obvious failings, anyone who chooses not to have children is behaving unethically -- as is anyone who has children, for that matter.)

0 comments

defen11y ago

> And as an aside, your test for ethics is entirely asinine, as it renders anything of sub-infinite scale unethical.

That's not his test, that's Kant's Categorical Imperative :)

mahyarm11y ago

Homework is going to put a bunch of candidates off unless its a short amount of time (~5 hrs) and as an alternative to taking time off of work to go do an in person interview.

I know one guy who did 30 hours total of interview investment, where a bunch of it was homework and was eventually not hired because he wasn't 'passionate' enough about payroll software! You don't want to waste your time doing such shit so you quickly start refusing long homework projects. Your in demand and you have better things to do with your time.

michaelt11y ago

  And as an aside, your test for ethics is entirely asinine

To me, "if everyone did X, would the scenario be tenable" sounds like a less fancy way of saying "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law."

That is to say, Kant's Categorical Imperative [1].

If you consider it asinine, I could introduce you to a lot of intelligent people you would think were asinine.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_imperative

hackinthebochs11y ago

Of course small is subjective, but I would consider, say, a 1 in 3 chance to be small in this case.

>test for ethics is entirely asinine, as it renders anything of sub-infinite scale unethical

I don't see how this is so. Explain?

>anyone who chooses not to have children is behaving unethically -- as is anyone who has children, for that matter

This is also not obvious. Of course tenable is poorly defined, but there is nothing contradictory/chaotic/unsustainable about everyone stopping having kids. Furthermore, it is not obvious to me that the statement "it is unethical to not have kids (if you're able)" is necessarily absurd.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse