It's called onomastics, son. Now get off my lawn.
Note the update on the "nominology" article: "As soon as this went to print, Rob Felty (a linguist) informed me that the established term for what I've called nominology is onomastics. Scooped by 295 years!"
And further discussion in the comments: http://messymatters.com/nominology/
EVOC - R
BREV - Y
GREP - G
GOOG - G
PRON - Y
SPEL - Y
VERB - R
Nominology:
EVOC - Y
BREV - Y
GREP - G
GOOG - G
PRON - G
SPEL - Y
VERB - Y (nominologize?)
Seems like nominology wins on at least a couple nominological categories. :)
It can be quite tough - and I ran into the naming problem many times over the years. Over 100,000,000 com domains are registered, iirc. It reached the point where I would spend days trying to come up with something that was a) good and b) available.
Frankly, I ended up feeling that finding a good name for a new project of mine was quite unlikely to happen. Which lead me the idea that the only way I'd be able to find usable (let alone high quality) names was by making a tool to help make it easier.
So I built Namebird - http://shobia.com/namebird
For it, I came up with a variety of probability based algorithims to generate names that are catchy and memorable. It works pretty nicely, imo. And, in making it, it has been able to help me find a large amount of domain names that would be good for startups.
Perhaps some here might find it of value.
FragrantDuck
CourteousOwl
RecklessPig
OtherMoose
CaringFrog
MindlessFish
UpbeatLizard
WhisperedHippo
SlushyWhale
OilyAccountant
CompassionateHog
InstructiveMonkey
ForkedCow
...
Of course I did not work on this script for quite a while, and it shows. To be really trendy I'd have to remove some vowels here and there, change a 'c' for a 'k' now and add the odd '-ly'. SteamWare
MountFont
CaviarBeta
ChipBinary
SystemCocoa
[1] http://montanaflynn.me/lab/startup-name-generator/Otherwise that's the best list I've seen yet!
EVOC - neutral. Fogbeam is evocative of something to do with light and illumination, so if we were a LED bulb manufacturer or something, it would be good. But we're using it as a metaphor, since we're a software company focusing on knowledge management, integration and collaboration. I think our tagline/slogan plays ties it together though "Cut through the information fog".
BREV - I think we're good here.
GREP - Yep.
GOOG - Very much. There are very few other references to the phrase "fogbeam" and the few there are relate to something obviously different - bulbs for auto fog lamps, etc.
PRON - Yep.
SPEL - Yep.
VERB - Fail. I don't think anybody will ever say "Go fogbeam that" to anybody else. :-(
For the most part, we get a lot of positive comments on the name when we introduce ourselves to people, so all in all, that's one decision that has worked out well. I don't think our name is so special that it will cause us to succeed all on it's own (could any name do that?) but I think it's more than good enough to not be an impediment.
What do you guys think?
PS: I don't think verbability is a total fail either. Hard to predict that one. Maybe some kind of "beam me up" phrasing could become the verbified version...
... was there a time it wasn't. Love that. Love reddit.
Also, dotomator can be useful for generating ideas. http://www.dotomator.com/
I went through a couple of namegenerators and I found bustaname.com to be the best of the lot - specially it's realtime domain availability check (.com/.org/.net)
Pair it with namechk.com to check availability of social media handles.
If you are looking for random 4/5/6 letter domains that might be available (mostly sedo) then domainnamesoup.com is at it - eg: http://www.domainnamesoup.com/5letterdomainnames.php
cuil.com had its 15 minutes of fame, but I see that Google acquired their patents and domain names:
http://searchengineland.com/googler-killer-cuil-patent-appli...
I genuinely felt embarrassed when I explained to them that the majority of startups etc have "silly" names. As I was talking about Anorak to them, every time I said it's name, I felt silly.
And yet, it's never bothered me before.
I'm not changing the name, but it made me realise.
Check it out: http://montanaflynn.me/lab/startup-name-generator/
I'm also proud of the way I implemented[1] the Domainr API[2] to check for domain availability. Previously I checked it in the backend but it made things very slow so now the backend generates the domains and the client lazily checks the availability.
[1] http://montanaflynn.me/lab/startup-name-generator/assets/mag...
The trademark application process, at its core, is simple data collection. Sadly, the TM Office website complicates this simple process with a set of baffling forms. Their design philosophy is “more but worse.” Only 40% of DIY apps are approved, so a TM lawyer is recommended. But if you're going to go DIY, just gird yourself for a miserable user experience.
Then again, what you make of the name also matters.
Selfishly curious, how would you rate my company's name, Modea?
That is a fact I've condemned about Stack Exchange and their founders on Meta.
> Yahoo is of course googlable today but from the perspective of choosing new names, anything that's a dictionary word isn't very unique
Interestingly enough, that domain name is for sale.
Example, sewage => Sewg