> The point of a corporation is to allocate resources more efficiently than could be done by legal individuals.
noise. tell me - which is more "efficient" (i.e profitable), avoiding paying out insurance claims over insignificant inaccuracies, or caring about the family of 5 with a household income of $30,000, who's dad broke his arm whilst cycling to work, by a driver who was on their phone and caused them to run a red light?
> We can expect corporations not to facilitate mass murder.
oh, so we should abolish arms manufacturers?
> We should expect corporations not to facilitate mass murder.
you should tell this to BAE, or Lockheed Martin, or.. well, literally anyone on this list; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_defense_contractors
> The argument that we should not punish transgressions just because some corporations are not punished for transgressions is cowardice in the highest degree.
absolutely not. there is no cowardice in that statement at all. it's a recognition of what companies in this world behave like. look at the actions of pretty much every big company. ask yourself - is your world view more accurate, or is mine?
again, i don't like it. it's sickening. but to hate these creations for doing exactly what they are made to do (again, make cash) is just.. senseless.