undefined | Better HN

0 pointsmasklinn11y ago0 comments

> With enough money in the fired party's bank account, it would be.

Most of the US is at-will, employees can be fired for no reason or any reason as long as there's no breach of relevant federal statutes (Equal Pay Act, Civil Rights Act, Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Americans with Disability Act, …) — the latter being why employees are generally fired with absolutely no reason provided just to avoid any possibility of status breach.

That means for most firings there is no legal recourse, because there is no legal labour protection.

Most of Europe is very different on that point, you can't fire somebody just because you feel like it, and there are a number of labour-focused courts which tend to have a very bad view of companies trying to break or skirt labour laws.

It's not a question of money, it's a question of laws, or the lack thereof.

0 comments

eloisant11y ago

In US to get rid of an employee, you have 2 choices: fire or lay off.

You can fire an employee for his performances or for a fault, and he's not entitled to any compensation.

You can lay off an employee whenever you want, but you usually have to give him a severance package and maybe other benefits.

The difference between US and Europe is that a layoff is easy in US, while in Europe you need a good reason (for example the company is losing money) and you have accountability in the way to pick who has to go. Also the severance package is bigger, and there is a several month notice to give.

Back to US, a fired employee can sue if if believe the firing was not appropriate. In this case, I don't know if Hank or Adria were actually fired or laid off. In the former they could have sued, in the latter there's nothing they could have done.

throwawayaway11y ago

I'm sure proceedings have been successfully made in such states, at great financial expense, to prove that even though no reason was given "federal statutes" were breached. Your argument that that has never happened and can never happen is much harder to make convincingly.

masklinnOP11y ago

> Your argument that that has never happened and can never happen is much harder to make convincingly.

No, my argument is that the vast majority of firings in the US are not covered by any labour protection laws or agreements. It's not a question of money when there's no law or contract to build your case on.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse