I agree that idiomatic Nim (if there is such a thing) is very different than idiomatic Python.
What I meant (and did not express clearly) is that you can write mostly pythonesque code in Nim, and it will perform as well as Go. You don't have to modify the syntax, use macros, define symbolic operators, operational transforms, etc any more than you have to use metaclasses in Python.
At it's core, if you write "typed python" code in Nim, it will work, be readable, and perform well.
