Pro tip: If your analogy needs a disclaimer that perpetuates gender stereotypes for it to work, then its probably sexist.
In other words, it's sexist in the sense that we recognize there is a biological difference between the sexes - we're not applying it to infer men are automatically rapists, or women are automatically unable to make executive decision. So maybe instead of playing around with labeling terms that carry a lot of negative connotations, you can actually consider the circumstance and context of what is being said before you label.
http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Gender_Differences_in_Porno...
Now combine that with some data from Christian Rudder's Dataclysm (just a link to a info-pic + summary article here):
http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2014-09-04/mining-okcup...
Men consume a lot more porn than women and hunt for casual sex a lot more than women. Actually, if you weren't so rustled, you could've just google'd "consumption of porn by gender" and gotten a lot more results than the two I put up there. But yeah, way to not walk away and accept that someone else has a valid point, and feel free to continue loudly cry "no, your stats suck", "give more sources", while hiding behind a throw-away account and throwing out sensational accusations of "sexism!" for the sake of accruing karma on your main one.