undefined | Better HN

0 pointsnickysielicki10y ago0 comments

Very interesting link, thanks for sharing.

From reading that, you can be near certain that RMS would agree.

0 comments

Or that he would have in 1992. The landscape has changed quite a bit since then.

And the terminology has improved greatly since then; for instance, nowadays the requirement would be described as making CLISP "GPL-compatible", rather than putting it under the GPL.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsnickysielicki10y ago0 comments

Very interesting link, thanks for sharing.

From reading that, you can be near certain that RMS would agree.

0 comments

JoshTriplett10y ago

Or that he would have in 1992. The landscape has changed quite a bit since then.

And the terminology has improved greatly since then; for instance, nowadays the requirement would be described as making CLISP "GPL-compatible", rather than putting it under the GPL.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse