undefined | Better HN

0 pointsMPSimmons10y ago0 comments

With the sheer amount of money backing ULA, there's no way they can be considered dead in the water. Their launch vessels are incredibly reliable, as mentioned elsewhere in this thread.

They're not just viable competitors, they're the current market leader. SpaceX is the peppy young upstart here (and still, failures like this are stepping stones to future reliability, if they're spending the time learning from their mistakes like they should be).

At least it was unmanned.

0 comments

greglindahl10y ago

ULA wins very little commercial business. So yes, they're the market leader for US government launches of extremely expensive satellites. The rest of the market, commercial and US government launches of less expensive stuff, is where SpaceX is way ahead of ULA.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsMPSimmons10y ago0 comments

With the sheer amount of money backing ULA, there's no way they can be considered dead in the water. Their launch vessels are incredibly reliable, as mentioned elsewhere in this thread.

At least it was unmanned.

0 comments

greglindahl10y ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse