It's just strange.
(Using copyrighted material is permitted under fair use; this website is a parody. I’m not a lawyer but at some level preserving the copyright notice is probably better than claiming it as their own.)
You may say that the original work is copyright of the respective owners and that this is a parody work. But that's not what the site is doing. The footer contains the original, unaltered copyright, creating confusion as to who owns the derived work. Amazon does not own this, nor do they endorse it, so you're not allowed to say it's copyrighted by Amazon.
Being concerned for the proper respect of IP laws is something that benefits everyone.
That's warped view of the world. A corporation can always take you to court and harass the crap out of you, the court will side with your defense because you were right and claimant was wrong, you had the right to do what you did.
Speeding? Basically a national past-time at this point.
Misrepresentation, common fraud, and misappropriation? Par for the course in most small businesses.
It's only a crime if someone gives enough of a shit to do something about it; otherwise, it's just life.
It is also clearly not satire. That would not hold up in court, and there are many instances where they have tried that angle and failed.
And consumers are clearly deceived - hence why my original comment asking about it was written and has several upvotes.
Amazon has much bigger legal issues to focus on than some satire.
