You can't take what politicians publicly support at face value unless they are proposing a law that will be passed because they hold the numbers to pass it.
Its easy to pick up some popular thing and parade it around when you will never have to put your money where your mouth is.
I think one of the best things Democrats could do would be to eliminate the enforcement of arbitration clauses and jury waivers from ISPs. If it is an essential service, there is no reason you should be forced to sign an arbitration agreement in order to get service.
What I really don't understand are the politicians who insist that websites should be declared common carriers but not ISPs.
A simple example is how on airplanes, WiFi doesn't support streaming video, etc. but allows text messaging. So would this bill make that illegal? If so, that wouldn't make video streaming on planes come sooner, just make plane WiFi more expensive.
NN aims to ban paid prioritization, and specifically allows for throttling for network management purposes. That means providers can throttle when links are busy, but not give certain services a priory lane.
