And no, vague and indirect "move to every square in order" located separately from the chess notation is not good information. Also, no, tiny nomenclature for ants on the board is not good information.
> to every square in order, right to left, top to bottom
Added to that immediately.
shrug But yeah as the title says, one realizes quickly that knight moves pretty strange so got bored after 5 targets and did something more exciting: wrote a Python script that prints me the moves from and to any coordinate (:
Yeah, but it's not clear that the instructions text is talking about that symbol, *because it doesn't say so* explicitly.
Sometimes a small level of information redundancy is good for communicating with humans, instead of forcing them to make the correct inferences in place.
(Much as I'm tempted to agree they were a bad idea, we're kind of past that point and it's sort of fine... A bad idea well-executed?)