Has there ever been an example of such a large amount of current hardware becoming redundant in terms of processing needs.
Did Microsoft exert more control for their period than current tech giants do now? How did their hold and influence on markets compare to current market leaders in present times.
If voting software and machines were government owned and they wished to open source the software for the sake of transparency - would there be any good reason not to do this?
There would no doubt be some benefits to making the code publicly accessible, a lot of which we see from the open source world already.
Are there any risks that would outweigh some of the benefits of open-sourcing or making code visible?
I’m trying to counterbalance the argument for open source code.