Since we're discussing the scenarios that the law might cover, your claim seems rather circular.
> It's a clear existing law. There is a clear line.
The entire point of my post is that the line isn't neat and clear at all. Very similar concerns come up in various other contexts, and we as a society are going to have to deal with the internal contradictions of current orthodox thinking one way or another, and probably soon.
Your comment is just asserting that the problem I described doesn't exist. It does. Wishing away reality doesn't make it disappear.
